Syllogisms
Subject: Reasoning | Frequency: 2-3 questions per APPSC paper | Time: 60-90 sec/question
Introduction
Syllogism questions give two or more premises (statements assumed true) followed by conclusions. You must determine which conclusions logically follow. APPSC favours 2-statement syllogisms with 2 conclusions, including possibility-based questions. The Venn diagram method is the most reliable technique.
Golden Rule: Accept premises as absolutely true. Do NOT use real-world knowledge.
Core Method
- Draw all possible Venn diagrams for the given statements
- Check each conclusion against ALL diagrams
- A conclusion is VALID only if true in ALL possible diagrams
- If neither follows alone, check complementary pairs for "either-or"
Four Statement Types
| Statement | Type | Venn Diagram |
|---|---|---|
| All A are B | Universal Affirmative | Circle A completely inside Circle B |
| No A is B | Universal Negative | Circles completely separate |
| Some A are B | Particular Affirmative | Circles partially overlap |
| Some A are not B | Particular Negative | Part of A is outside B |
Quick Rules
| Rule | Application |
|---|---|
| Two particular statements | No definite conclusion |
| Two negative statements | No definite conclusion |
| One particular premise | Conclusion must be particular |
| One negative premise | Conclusion must be negative |
| Converse of "Some A are B" | "Some B are A" always valid |
| "All A are B" implies | "Some A are B" also true |
Worked Examples — Easy
Q1: Statements: All dogs are cats. All cats are birds. Conclusions: I. All dogs are birds. II. All birds are dogs.
- Dogs inside cats inside birds → All dogs are birds (valid)
- Birds may contain non-cats → All birds are dogs (invalid)
- Answer: Only I follows
Q2: Statements: Some pens are pencils. All pencils are erasers. Conclusions: I. Some pens are erasers. II. All erasers are pencils.
- Some pens overlap pencils, pencils inside erasers → Some pens are erasers (valid)
- Erasers may contain more than pencils → All erasers are pencils (invalid)
- Answer: Only I follows
Q3: Statements: No apple is a banana. All bananas are cherries. Conclusions: I. No apple is a cherry. II. Some cherries are not apples.
- Apples separate from bananas, bananas inside cherries
- I: Apples might overlap with non-banana cherries → not necessarily true (invalid)
- II: Bananas are cherries but not apples → some cherries are definitely not apples (valid)
- Answer: Only II follows
Worked Examples — Medium
Q4: Statements: All flowers are trees. Some trees are fruits. Conclusions: I. Some flowers are fruits. II. Some fruits are trees.
- Flowers inside trees, some trees overlap fruits
- I: Overlapping trees might not be flowers → not definite (invalid)
- II: Converse of "Some trees are fruits" → always valid
- Answer: Only II follows
Q5: Statements: Some kings are queens. Some queens are jacks. Conclusions: I. Some kings are jacks. II. No king is a jack.
- Two particular statements → no definite conclusion
- I invalid, II invalid
- Complementary pair? "Some kings are jacks" vs "No king is a jack" — YES
- Answer: Either I or II follows
Q6: Statements: All A are B. No B is C. Some C are D. Conclusions: I. No A is C. II. Some D are not B.
- A inside B, B separate from C → A separate from C → No A is C (valid)
- Some C are D, no B is C → those D-containing C's are not B → Some D are not B (valid)
- Answer: Both I and II follow
Worked Examples — Hard
Q7: Statements: All books are pages. Some pages are words. No word is a sentence. Conclusions: I. Some books are not sentences. II. Some pages are not sentences.
- Books inside pages. Some pages are words. Words separate from sentences.
- II: Pages that are words are definitely not sentences → valid
- I: Books might all be in the non-word part of pages → could overlap with sentences → not guaranteed
- Answer: Only II follows
Q8: Statements: No cat is a dog. All dogs are horses. Some horses are cows. Conclusions: I. Some horses are not cats. II. Some cows are not cats.
- Dogs inside horses, dogs separate from cats → some horses (the dog-horses) are not cats → valid
- Cow-horses may or may not overlap with cats → II not guaranteed
- Answer: Only I follows
Q9: Possibility: Statements: Some A are B. All B are C. Conclusion: "All A can be C" — possible?
- Some A are B, B inside C. Remaining A's could also be C.
- Is there a valid diagram where all A are C? Yes (A inside C).
- Answer: Yes, the possibility exists
Shortcuts & Tricks
| Shortcut | When to Use |
|---|---|
| Two particular = no conclusion | Immediate elimination |
| Two negative = no conclusion | Immediate elimination |
| One negative → negative conclusion | Must contain "not" or "no" |
| One particular → particular conclusion | Must contain "some" |
| Check complementary pairs | If neither follows alone, check either-or |
| Converse of "Some A are B" | "Some B are A" always valid |
| "All A are B" implies "Some A are B" | Universal implies particular |
Common Mistakes
- Using real-world knowledge — "All dogs are birds" must be accepted as true
- Drawing only one Venn diagram — must check ALL possible diagrams
- Missing either-or conclusions — forgetting to check complementary pairs
- Confusing possible vs definite — "Can be" is different from "Must be"
- Reversing universal statements — "All A are B" does NOT mean "All B are A"
Exam Strategy
- Master the Venn diagram method — draw 2-3 possible diagrams per problem
- The rules table above eliminates most distractors immediately
- APPSC keeps difficulty at medium; 2-statement problems are standard
- Time: 60-90 seconds per question
- Always check for either-or when both individual conclusions fail
- Negative marking: -0.333 — use the quick rules to be confident
Practice Questions
- All A are B. All B are C. Conclusion: All A are C? → Follows (A inside B inside C)
- Some X are Y. No Y is Z. Conclusion: Some X are not Z? → Follows
- No P is Q. No Q is R. Any conclusion about P and R? → No definite conclusion (two negatives)
- All men are mortal. Socrates is a man. Conclusion: Socrates is mortal? → Follows
- Some A are B. Some B are C. Conclusion: Some A are C? → Does not follow (two particulars)
Key Terms / Formulas
| Term | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Premise | A statement assumed to be true |
| Conclusion | A statement that may or may not logically follow |
| Universal Affirmative | "All A are B" |
| Universal Negative | "No A is B" |
| Particular Affirmative | "Some A are B" |
| Particular Negative | "Some A are not B" |
| Complementary pair | Two conclusions that are logical negations of each other |
| Either-or | When neither conclusion follows alone but one of them must be true |